Modular, field-ready Malaise trap for efficient insect sampling

This Townes-style ez-Malaise trap is a modular flight-interception trap designed for passive insect sampling.  A central mesh panel intercepts flying insects such as Diptera and Hymenoptera and guides them upward into a collection bottle without bait.  The shock-corded pole frame allows quick deployment of the Malaise trap in locations without trees, requiring minimal guy ropes.  As a portable and modular insect trap, all major components are replaceable, supporting both long-term monitoring and short-term, relocatable surveys.

Detailed Description

A Malaise trap presents a vertical barrier that flying insects collide with; many then move upward toward light and are guided into a collection bottle at the top.  Because the method is unbaited, catch rates rely on placement, making ease of deployment crucial for study design and consistency.  In routine surveys, this tool serves as ecological monitoring equipment and general insect-collecting gear for aerial arthropods.

This version of the Malaise trap, the ez-Malaise trap, is highly effective and reliable for sampling active, sub-canopy flying insects such as Diptera and Hymenoptera.  It maintains the traditional Townes-style Malaise trap design while incorporating field-friendly innovations:

• Modular design — Each component (collection head, fabric body, poles) can be purchased and replaced individually, reducing downtime and extending service life.
• Shock-corded pole framework — Set up in minutes by clipping the fabric body to the provided poles.  Requires only a minimum of two guy ropes, making the trap nearly freestanding and ideal for habitats lacking natural supports.
• Rapid deployment — Lightweight and portable design allows quick repositioning during short-term or multi-site surveys with minimal hardware to carry, reducing field time per site and facilitating standardized trap-days.
• Dual mounting options — Use the ez-Malaise trap with its own pole frame or hang it from trees or other supports using the built-in loops for traditional setup.

Field Notes

• Place along trails, forest edges, or stream corridors; orient the central panel roughly perpendicular to expected flight paths.
• Keep entry paths clear of obstructions.  Modest shade helps reduce evaporation in warm weather.  Re-tension lines after wind or a heavy catch.
• Service collection bottles on a regular schedule (e.g., weekly), adjusting for temperature and catch volume.
• Choose a preservative compatible with your workflow (e.g., ethanol for morphology or DNA); on labels, include trap ID, date/time, and preservative.
• In hot or dry conditions, monitor preservative level and top up as needed to prevent specimen desiccation.
• For multi-trap designs, place units approximately 50–150 meters apart to minimize spatial dependence; record effort in trap-days and monitor covariates such as weather, vegetation structure, and edge distance.
• If orientation bias or flight direction is a study target, use the dual-head ez-Migration trap to collect both directions separately.
• For canopy or multi-layer sampling, consider using the all-terrain SLAM trap (Sea, Land, and Air Malaise) variant.  It is freestanding, can be suspended at canopy heights, and can be daisy-chained through sewn loops to sample ground-to-canopy strata.

Pack Contents

• 1 × Fabric Trap Body
• 1 × Shock-corded Pole (L309 cm)
• 1 × Shock-corded Pole (L459 cm)
• 1 × Collection Head (pre-installed)
• 3 × Collection Bottles (1 pre-installed)
• 9 × Guy Ropes
• 9 × Plastic X-Stakes
• 8 × Alloy Pin Stakes
• 1 × Carrying Bag

Click to Search for Studies Using This Product Line

Collection of related articles from the last 10 years:

• The Hemiptera (Insecta) of Canada: Constructing a Reference Library of DNA Barcodes. Gwiazdowski et al. (2015). PLoS One, 10(4), e0125635.
• DNA barcoding in diverse educational settings: five case studies. Henter et al. (2016). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1702), 20150340.
• The School Malaise Trap Program: coupling educational outreach with scientific discovery. Steinke et al. (2017). PLoS Biology, 15(4), e2001829.
• Arthropods in modern resins reveal if amber accurately recorded forest arthropod communities. Solórzano Kraemer et al. (2018). PNAS, 115(26), 6739-6744.
• Expedited assessment of terrestrial arthropod diversity by coupling Malaise traps with DNA barcoding. deWaard et al. (2019). Genome, 62(3), 85-95.
• Using DNA-barcoded Malaise trap samples to measure impact of a geothermal energy project on the biodiversity of a Costa Rican old-growth rain forest. Janzen et al. (2020). Genome, 63(9), 407-436.
• A Review of Terrestrial and Canopy Malaise Traps. Michael et al. (2021). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 114(1), 27-47.
• Peering into the Darkness: DNA Barcoding Reveals Surprisingly High Diversity of Unknown Species of Diptera (Insecta) in Germany. Chimeno et al. (2022). Insects, 13(1), 82.
• Optimizing insect metabarcoding using replicated mock communities. Iwaszkiewicz‐Eggebrecht et al. (2023). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14(4), 1130-1146.
• Global arthropod beta-diversity is spatially and temporally structured by latitude. Seymour et al. (2024). Communications Biology, 7(1), 552.