ez-Malaise Trap II, Townes Style

  • Model:BT1012
Ordered Quantity 1 2+
 Discount -0% -10%
Price per Unit $439.00 USD $395.10 USD

New modular design, each trap component can be purchased and replaced individually in case of loss or damage.  To replace the collection head or fabric trap body, please refer to the manual “Trap Collection Head” included in the package for detailed instructions.

One advantage of the Malaise trap is that it efficiently catches flying insects such as Hymenoptera and Diptera.  Since it does not, by itself, attract insects, the placement of a Malaise trap can significantly affect the number of insects caught.  This Townes-style ez-Malaise trap is for scientists experienced with the hassles of setting up a Malaise trap when the ideal location has no trees to supply support.

Fast & Easy - Set Up ez-Malaise Trap in Minutes!

Of the same dimensions as our traditional Malaise trap, the ez-Malaise trap is improved by the addition of a framework of shock-corded poles, permitting quick installation.  Simply hook clips onto provided poles.  The ez-Malaise trap is nearly freestanding, requiring a minimum of two guy ropes.  This time-saving feature is a lifesaver for those who need to deploy many Malaise traps in habitats where trees and bushes are hard to reach.

The Malaise trap is often viewed as a long-term sampling tool.  Since this ez-Malaise trap is so easy to assemble, it can be repositioned anytime and used on a short-term basis.

If necessary, the ez-Malaise trap can be set up without provided poles.  It comes with all the loops needed for traditional installation: supported with poles or hanging from trees.

Package Contents
x1 Fabric Trap Body
x1 Shock-corded Pole (L309 cm)
x1 Shock-corded Pole (L459 cm)
x1 Collection Head (pre-installed)
x3 Collection Bottles (x1 pre-installed)
x9 Guy Lines
x9 Plastic X-Stakes
x8 Alloy Pin Stakes
x1 Carrying Bag

Studies Using This Line of Products
Van Achterberg (2009). Entomologische Berichten, 69(4), 129-135.
Han et al. (2012). Entomological Research, 42(4), 180-184.
Sardinas & Kremen (2014). Basic and Applied Ecology, 15(2), 161-168.
Yoshioka et al. (2015). PLoS One, 10(11), e0140957.
Souza et al. (2015). Sociobiology, 62(3), 450-456.
Gwiazdowski et al. (2015). PLoS One, 10(4), e0125635.
Geiger et al. (2016). Biodiversity Data Journal, 4, e10671.
Henter et al. (2016). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1702), 20150340.
Skvarla & Dowling (2017). Journal of Insect Science, 17(1), 1-28.
Steinke et al. (2017). PLoS Biology, 15(4), e2001829.
Aagaard et al. (2017). Urban Ecosystems, 20(2), 353-361.
Solórzano Kraemer et al. (2018). PNAS, 115(26), 6739-6744.
Saunders & Ward (2018). PeerJ, 6, e4642.
Morinière et al. (2019). Molecular Ecology Resources, 19(4), 900-928.
deWaard et al. (2019). Genome, 62(3), 85-95.
Ronquist et al. (2020). PLoS One, 15(3), e0228561.
Swoboda-Bhattarai & Burrack (2020). Environmental Entomology, 49(2), 277-287.
de Kerdrel et al. (2020). Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-12.
Janzen et al. (2020). Genome, 63(9), 407-436.
Basset et al. (2020). Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, 4, e58572.
Michael et al. (2021). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 114(1), 27-47.
Tanvir Rahman et al. (2021). Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 4656-4669.
Steinke et al. (2021). Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, 5, e59201.
Sharkey et al. (2021). ZooKeys, 1013(4), 1-665.
Chimeno et al. (2022). Insects, 13(1), 82.
Bukowski et al. (2022). PloS One, 17(4), e0267390.
Steinke et al. (2022). GigaScience, 11.
Petersen et al. (2022). Land, 12(1), 54.
Cancino-López et al. (2022). Insects, 13(7), 652.
Grimaldi & Richenbacher (2023). American Museum Novitates, 2023(3997), 1-28.
Lacoeuilhe et al. (2023). Biodiversity Data Journal, 11, e103280.
Chimeno et al. (2023). PLoS One, 18(8), e0290173.
Quicke et al. (2023). Forests, 14(10), 1991.
Sire et al. (2023). PeerJ, 11, e16022.